VSCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Torrid Holdings has a net margin of -4.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of -0.45%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99% beat Torrid Holdings's return on equity of --.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling downside risk potential of -0.57%. On the other hand Torrid Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.13%. Given that Torrid Holdings has more downside risk than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Torrid Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Torrid Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues of $263.8M. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M is lower than Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Torrid Holdings's PE ratio is 31.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.58x versus 0.45x for Torrid Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gap has a net margin of -4.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of 7.16%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99% beat Gap's return on equity of 29.82%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling downside risk potential of -0.57%. On the other hand Gap has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.56%. Given that Gap has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Gap is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gap has a beta of 2.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.602%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gap offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap pays out 44.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Gap quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M is lower than Gap's net income of $274M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Gap's PE ratio is 11.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.58x versus 0.61x for Gap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J.Jill has a net margin of -4.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of 8.16%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99% beat J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling downside risk potential of -0.57%. On the other hand J.Jill has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.65%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J.Jill has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.564%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. J.Jill offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. J.Jill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than J.Jill quarterly revenues of $151.3M. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M is lower than J.Jill's net income of $12.3M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while J.Jill's PE ratio is 9.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.58x versus 0.64x for J.Jill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of -4.16% compared to Victoria's Secret &'s net margin of 7.56%. Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 15.11%.

Victoria's Secret & has a consensus price target of $21.49, signalling downside risk potential of -0.57%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $44.03 which suggests that it could fall by -14.9%. Given that Urban Outfitters has more downside risk than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.524%.

Victoria's Secret & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria's Secret & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M is lower than Urban Outfitters's net income of $102.9M. Notably, Victoria's Secret &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria's Secret & is 0.58x versus 0.96x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.