VTLE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -67.26% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -9%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 53.91%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.38 which suggests that it could grow by 44.04%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.073, which suggesting that the stock is 207.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.95%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $534.4M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 102.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.41x versus 1.95x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of -67.26% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -4786.13%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -93.33%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 53.91%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.073, which suggesting that the stock is 207.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.551, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.909%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $534.4M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $166.5K. Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M is lower than Houston American Energy's net income of -$8M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.41x versus 14.51x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -67.26% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 24.81%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 53.91%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.073, which suggesting that the stock is 207.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.098%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $534.4M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.41x versus 2.42x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a net margin of -67.26% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 56.45%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12% beat North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 503.84%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $33.18, signalling upside risk potential of 53.91%. On the other hand North European Oil Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than North European Oil Royalty Trust, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than North European Oil Royalty Trust.

Vital Energy has a beta of 3.073, which suggesting that the stock is 207.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.624%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. North European Oil Royalty Trust offers a yield of 9.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $534.4M, which are larger than North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $505.7K. Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M is lower than North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $285.5K. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while North European Oil Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 8.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.41x versus 7.40x for North European Oil Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.