X Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 7.16%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $41.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.76%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 53.61%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 4.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.66x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of -10.34%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $41.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.76%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $11.21 which suggests that it could grow by 60.39%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.028%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.17x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 0.93%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $41.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.76%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.75%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.862%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 5.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 18.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.29x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 5.35%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $41.65, signalling upside risk potential of 6.76%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $144.86 which suggests that it could grow by 27.57%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.18x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 11.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 1.01x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.