Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Buy
73
BCHMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.26
Seasonality move
:
-32.88%
Day range:
$6.54 - $6.54
52-week range:
$5.94 - $10.18
Dividend yield:
1.33%
P/E ratio:
38.57x
P/S ratio:
7.60x
P/B ratio:
3.37x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
-26.1%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$642.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.17
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$6.54 | -- | $4.9B | 38.57x | $0.04 | 1.33% | 7.60x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$11.31 | -- | $3.7B | 41.70x | $0.47 | 4.16% | 0.80x |
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
$703.72 | -- | $16.5B | 31.96x | $18.49 | 2.09% | 7.04x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$88.91 | -- | $41B | 35.76x | $1.50 | 1.69% | 5.18x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
$19.52 | -- | $54.8B | 16.36x | $0.62 | 3.17% | 1.84x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$24.09 | -- | $38.6B | 28.17x | $0.36 | 1.51% | 2.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 1.067 | -- | 1.57x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
45.79% | -1.031 | 38.27% | 0.79x |
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 0.259 | -- | 2.39x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
53.25% | 1.034 | 12.51% | 0.84x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | 1.293 | -- | 0.79x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.29% | 1.407 | 14.55% | 1.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 8.65% | 8.65% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 2.13% | 3.32% | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 11.36% | 24.76% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | 9.38% | 10.97% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 9.98% | 21.13% | -- | -- |
Bachem Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 3.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or CLZNY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 102.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clariant AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.57x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 41.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.60x versus 0.80x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.80x 41.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or EMSHF?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65% beat Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ems-Chemie Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Ems-Chemie Holding AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Ems-Chemie Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or EMSHF More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.347%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Ems-Chemie Holding AG offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays out 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.57x while Ems-Chemie Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.60x versus 7.04x for Ems-Chemie Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- -- EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 24.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $10.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or GVDNY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 69.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.57x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 35.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.60x versus 5.18x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA5.18x 35.76x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or HCMLY?
Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B HCMLYHolcim-- -- $30.1B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or HCMLY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.507%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Holcim offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.57x while Holcim's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.60x versus 1.84x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- -- HCMLYHolcim1.84x 16.36x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 21.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $13.8B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or SXYAY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 46.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.57x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.60x versus 2.97x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- -- SXYAYSika AG2.97x 28.17x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 26
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
