How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Buy
52
EMSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$703.72
Seasonality move
:
-2.01%
Day range:
$703.72 - $703.72
52-week range:
$681.11 - $855.98
Dividend yield:
2.09%
P/E ratio:
31.96x
P/S ratio:
7.04x
P/B ratio:
7.40x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-9.78%
Market cap:
$16.5B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$22.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
$703.72 | -- | $16.5B | 31.96x | $18.49 | 2.09% | 7.04x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$6.54 | -- | $4.9B | 38.57x | $0.04 | 1.33% | 7.60x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$11.31 | -- | $3.7B | 41.70x | $0.47 | 4.16% | 0.80x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$88.91 | -- | $41B | 35.76x | $1.50 | 1.69% | 5.18x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
$19.52 | -- | $54.8B | 16.36x | $0.62 | 3.17% | 1.84x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$24.09 | -- | $38.6B | 28.17x | $0.36 | 1.51% | 2.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 0.259 | -- | 2.39x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 1.067 | -- | 1.57x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
45.79% | -1.031 | 38.27% | 0.79x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
53.25% | 1.034 | 12.51% | 0.84x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | 1.293 | -- | 0.79x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.29% | 1.407 | 14.55% | 1.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 8.65% | 8.65% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 2.13% | 3.32% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 11.36% | 24.76% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | 9.38% | 10.97% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 9.98% | 21.13% | -- | -- |
Ems-Chemie Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or BCHMY?
Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or BCHMY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 38.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 7.60x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.60x 38.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 3.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or CLZNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 102.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 41.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 0.80x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.80x 41.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 24.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $10.3B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GVDNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 69.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 35.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 5.18x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA5.18x 35.76x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or HCMLY?
Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B HCMLYHolcim-- -- $30.1B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or HCMLY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.507%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Holcim offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Holcim's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 1.84x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- HCMLYHolcim1.84x 16.36x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 21.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $13.8B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or SXYAY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 46.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 2.97x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- SXYAYSika AG2.97x 28.17x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 26
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
