CDCTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lead Real Estate has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of --. Goldcrest's return on equity of 2.79% beat Lead Real Estate's return on equity of 16.92%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lead Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Lead Real Estate, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Lead Real Estate.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.784% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lead Real Estate has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Lead Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Goldcrest pays 70.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lead Real Estate pays out 3.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $43.2M, which are larger than Lead Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Goldcrest's net income of $7.5M is higher than Lead Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Lead Real Estate's PE ratio is 6.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 0.21x for Lead Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 12.15%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 2.79% beat Nomura Real Estate Holdings's return on equity of 10.1%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Real Estate Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Nomura Real Estate Holdings, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Nomura Real Estate Holdings.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.784% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Nomura Real Estate Holdings offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Goldcrest pays 70.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Real Estate Holdings pays out 33.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $43.2M, which are smaller than Nomura Real Estate Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Goldcrest's net income of $7.5M is lower than Nomura Real Estate Holdings's net income of $156.6M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Nomura Real Estate Holdings's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 0.87x for Nomura Real Estate Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Realty & Development has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 23.61%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 2.79% beat Sumitomo Realty & Development's return on equity of 9.19%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Realty & Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Realty & Development, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Sumitomo Realty & Development.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.784% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Realty & Development has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.284%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Sumitomo Realty & Development offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Goldcrest pays 70.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Realty & Development pays out 15.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $43.2M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Realty & Development quarterly revenues of $2B. Goldcrest's net income of $7.5M is lower than Sumitomo Realty & Development's net income of $478.2M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Sumitomo Realty & Development's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 2.17x for Sumitomo Realty & Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Tatemono has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Goldcrest's net margin of 4.69%. Goldcrest's return on equity of 2.79% beat Tokyo Tatemono's return on equity of 9.8%.

Goldcrest has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Tatemono has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldcrest has higher upside potential than Tokyo Tatemono, analysts believe Goldcrest is more attractive than Tokyo Tatemono.

Goldcrest has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.784% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Tatemono has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.362%.

Goldcrest has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Tokyo Tatemono offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Goldcrest pays 70.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Tatemono pays out 33.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Goldcrest quarterly revenues are $43.2M, which are smaller than Tokyo Tatemono quarterly revenues of $553.9M. Goldcrest's net income of $7.5M is lower than Tokyo Tatemono's net income of $26M. Notably, Goldcrest's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Tokyo Tatemono's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldcrest is 2.17x versus 1.04x for Tokyo Tatemono. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.