DWAHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lead Real Estate has a net margin of 7.1% compared to Daiwa House Industry's net margin of --. Daiwa House Industry's return on equity of 11.99% beat Lead Real Estate's return on equity of 16.92%.

Daiwa House Industry has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lead Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Daiwa House Industry has higher upside potential than Lead Real Estate, analysts believe Daiwa House Industry is more attractive than Lead Real Estate.

Daiwa House Industry has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lead Real Estate has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Daiwa House Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Lead Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Daiwa House Industry pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Lead Real Estate pays out 3.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Daiwa House Industry quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Lead Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Daiwa House Industry's net income of $586.3M is higher than Lead Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Daiwa House Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Lead Real Estate's PE ratio is 6.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Daiwa House Industry is 0.56x versus 0.21x for Lead Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a net margin of 7.1% compared to Daiwa House Industry's net margin of 12.15%. Daiwa House Industry's return on equity of 11.99% beat Nomura Real Estate Holdings's return on equity of 10.1%.

Daiwa House Industry has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Real Estate Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Daiwa House Industry has higher upside potential than Nomura Real Estate Holdings, analysts believe Daiwa House Industry is more attractive than Nomura Real Estate Holdings.

Daiwa House Industry has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Real Estate Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Daiwa House Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Nomura Real Estate Holdings offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Daiwa House Industry pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Real Estate Holdings pays out 33.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Daiwa House Industry quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Nomura Real Estate Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Daiwa House Industry's net income of $586.3M is higher than Nomura Real Estate Holdings's net income of $156.6M. Notably, Daiwa House Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Nomura Real Estate Holdings's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Daiwa House Industry is 0.56x versus 0.87x for Nomura Real Estate Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Realty & Development has a net margin of 7.1% compared to Daiwa House Industry's net margin of 23.61%. Daiwa House Industry's return on equity of 11.99% beat Sumitomo Realty & Development's return on equity of 9.19%.

Daiwa House Industry has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Realty & Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Daiwa House Industry has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Realty & Development, analysts believe Daiwa House Industry is more attractive than Sumitomo Realty & Development.

Daiwa House Industry has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Realty & Development has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.284%.

Daiwa House Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Sumitomo Realty & Development offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Daiwa House Industry pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Realty & Development pays out 15.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Daiwa House Industry quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Sumitomo Realty & Development quarterly revenues of $2B. Daiwa House Industry's net income of $586.3M is higher than Sumitomo Realty & Development's net income of $478.2M. Notably, Daiwa House Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Sumitomo Realty & Development's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Daiwa House Industry is 0.56x versus 2.17x for Sumitomo Realty & Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Tatemono has a net margin of 7.1% compared to Daiwa House Industry's net margin of 4.69%. Daiwa House Industry's return on equity of 11.99% beat Tokyo Tatemono's return on equity of 9.8%.

Daiwa House Industry has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Tatemono has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Daiwa House Industry has higher upside potential than Tokyo Tatemono, analysts believe Daiwa House Industry is more attractive than Tokyo Tatemono.

Daiwa House Industry has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Tatemono has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.362%.

Daiwa House Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Tokyo Tatemono offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Daiwa House Industry pays 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Tatemono pays out 33.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Daiwa House Industry quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Tokyo Tatemono quarterly revenues of $553.9M. Daiwa House Industry's net income of $586.3M is higher than Tokyo Tatemono's net income of $26M. Notably, Daiwa House Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Tokyo Tatemono's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Daiwa House Industry is 0.56x versus 1.04x for Tokyo Tatemono. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.