CHVKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Longfor Group Holdings has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Longfor Group Holdings's return on equity of 4.48%.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Longfor Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than Longfor Group Holdings, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than Longfor Group Holdings.

China Vanke has a beta of 85.413, which suggesting that the stock is 8441.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Longfor Group Holdings has a beta of 0.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.168%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Longfor Group Holdings offers a yield of 6.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Longfor Group Holdings pays out 13.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Longfor Group Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but China Vanke's is not.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Longfor Group Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than Longfor Group Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.03x while Longfor Group Holdings's PE ratio is 5.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.15x versus 0.36x for Longfor Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ucommune International has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Ucommune International's return on equity of -36.07%.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ucommune International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than Ucommune International, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than Ucommune International.

China Vanke has a beta of 85.413, which suggesting that the stock is 8441.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ucommune International has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.534%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ucommune International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Ucommune International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Ucommune International quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than Ucommune International's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.03x while Ucommune International's PE ratio is 0.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.15x versus 0.02x for Ucommune International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wetouch Technology has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of 23.06%. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat Wetouch Technology's return on equity of 3.23%.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wetouch Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than Wetouch Technology, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than Wetouch Technology.

China Vanke has a beta of 85.413, which suggesting that the stock is 8441.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wetouch Technology has a beta of 0.004, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.63%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wetouch Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Wetouch Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than Wetouch Technology quarterly revenues of $11.5M. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Wetouch Technology's net income of $2.7M. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.03x while Wetouch Technology's PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.15x versus 0.48x for Wetouch Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XChange Tec has a net margin of -10.49% compared to China Vanke's net margin of --. China Vanke's return on equity of -4.91% beat XChange Tec's return on equity of --.

China Vanke has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XChange Tec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Vanke has higher upside potential than XChange Tec, analysts believe China Vanke is more attractive than XChange Tec.

China Vanke has a beta of 85.413, which suggesting that the stock is 8441.284% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XChange Tec has a beta of -0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 178.484%.

China Vanke has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XChange Tec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Vanke pays 181.96% of its earnings as a dividend. XChange Tec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

China Vanke quarterly revenues are $10.8B, which are larger than XChange Tec quarterly revenues of --. China Vanke's net income of -$1.1B is higher than XChange Tec's net income of --. Notably, China Vanke's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.03x while XChange Tec's PE ratio is 0.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Vanke is 0.15x versus -- for XChange Tec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.