DLICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 29.97%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.53 which suggests that it could grow by 18.97%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.118%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.53x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.34x versus 2.47x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $13.01 which suggests that it could grow by 12.21%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.333%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.53x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 10.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.34x versus 3.04x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 22.13%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.28%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.43 which suggests that it could grow by 39.84%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.153%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $665.1M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.53x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 7.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.34x versus 1.49x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.