WHLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cintas has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Wilhelmina International's net margin of 17.51%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.3% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

Wilhelmina International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.08%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.35%. Given that Wilhelmina International has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe Wilhelmina International is more attractive than Cintas.

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.287%.

Wilhelmina International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Wilhelmina International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wilhelmina International quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Wilhelmina International's net income of $310K is lower than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, Wilhelmina International's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.73x while Cintas's PE ratio is 44.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilhelmina International is 1.05x versus 7.70x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Wilhelmina International's net margin of -47.19%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.3% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -15.5%.

Wilhelmina International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.08%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $13.13 which suggests that it could grow by 44.55%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than Wilhelmina International, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than Wilhelmina International.

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.56%.

Wilhelmina International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Wilhelmina International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wilhelmina International quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $145.6M. Wilhelmina International's net income of $310K is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$68.7M. Notably, Wilhelmina International's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.73x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilhelmina International is 1.05x versus 0.52x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Wilhelmina International's net margin of -0.38%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.3% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

Wilhelmina International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.08%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 258.97%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than Wilhelmina International, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than Wilhelmina International.

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

Wilhelmina International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wilhelmina International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wilhelmina International quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. Wilhelmina International's net income of $310K is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, Wilhelmina International's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.73x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 3.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilhelmina International is 1.05x versus 0.21x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 6.79% compared to Wilhelmina International's net margin of 30.33%. Wilhelmina International's return on equity of 2.3% beat Verisk Analytics's return on equity of 264.01%.

Wilhelmina International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.08%. On the other hand Verisk Analytics has an analysts' consensus of $252.93 which suggests that it could grow by 3.9%. Given that Wilhelmina International has higher upside potential than Verisk Analytics, analysts believe Wilhelmina International is more attractive than Verisk Analytics.

Wilhelmina International has a beta of 0.777, which suggesting that the stock is 22.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.242%.

Wilhelmina International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verisk Analytics offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Wilhelmina International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 32.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Verisk Analytics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wilhelmina International quarterly revenues are $4.6M, which are smaller than Verisk Analytics quarterly revenues of $725.3M. Wilhelmina International's net income of $310K is lower than Verisk Analytics's net income of $220M. Notably, Wilhelmina International's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.73x while Verisk Analytics's PE ratio is 43.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wilhelmina International is 1.05x versus 14.07x for Verisk Analytics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.