MET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 6.92% compared to MetLife's net margin of 62.3%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.21% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $63.38 which suggests that it could grow by 13.98%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

MetLife has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.235%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.4B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. MetLife's net income of $1.3B is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.48x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 10.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.82x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life has a net margin of 6.92% compared to MetLife's net margin of 17.4%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.21% beat Globe Life's return on equity of 21.68%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Globe Life has an analysts' consensus of $141.09 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Globe Life, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Globe Life.

MetLife has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.884%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Globe Life offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life pays out 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.4B, which are larger than Globe Life quarterly revenues of $1.5B. MetLife's net income of $1.3B is higher than Globe Life's net income of $255.2M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.48x while Globe Life's PE ratio is 10.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.82x versus 2.03x for Globe Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 6.92% compared to MetLife's net margin of 21.2%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.21% beat Primerica's return on equity of 22.24%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $313.57 which suggests that it could grow by 9.88%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Primerica.

MetLife has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.492%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.4B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $788.1M. MetLife's net income of $1.3B is higher than Primerica's net income of $167.1M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.48x while Primerica's PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.82x versus 3.14x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 6.92% compared to MetLife's net margin of -0.45%. MetLife's return on equity of 15.21% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97%.

MetLife has a consensus price target of $95.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.68%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $125.69 which suggests that it could grow by 15.86%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

MetLife has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.545% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.891%.

MetLife has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. MetLife pays 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MetLife quarterly revenues are $18.4B, which are larger than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $12.6B. MetLife's net income of $1.3B is higher than Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M. Notably, MetLife's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.48x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MetLife is 0.82x versus 0.55x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.