AZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Best Buy has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 0.84%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Best Buy's return on equity of 30.63%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,749.21, signalling upside risk potential of 2.1%. On the other hand Best Buy has an analysts' consensus of $89.89 which suggests that it could grow by 20.47%. Given that Best Buy has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Best Buy is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Best Buy has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.973%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Best Buy offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy pays out 87.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Best Buy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Best Buy quarterly revenues of $13.9B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Best Buy's net income of $117M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while Best Buy's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 0.39x for Best Buy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carter's has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 7.16%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Carter's's return on equity of 22.18%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,749.21, signalling upside risk potential of 2.1%. On the other hand Carter's has an analysts' consensus of $45.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.69%. Given that Carter's has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Carter's is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carter's has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.09%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carter's offers a yield of 7.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's pays out 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Carter's quarterly revenues of $859.7M. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than Carter's's net income of $61.5M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while Carter's's PE ratio is 8.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 0.52x for Carter's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVgo has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of -18.39%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat EVgo's return on equity of -9.01%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,749.21, signalling upside risk potential of 2.1%. On the other hand EVgo has an analysts' consensus of $6.71 which suggests that it could grow by 135.38%. Given that EVgo has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe EVgo is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVgo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVgo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVgo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than EVgo quarterly revenues of $67.5M. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is higher than EVgo's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while EVgo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 1.18x for EVgo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of 12.35% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 13.46%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,749.21, signalling upside risk potential of 2.1%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,409.48 which suggests that it could grow by 2.47%. Given that O'Reilly Automotive has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe O'Reilly Automotive is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.248% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.025%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. AutoZone's net income of $487.9M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $551.1M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 33.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.43x versus 4.83x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.