CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 15.19%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat General Mills's return on equity of 27.15%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.83, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $71.16 which suggests that it could grow by 11.87%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.098, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.21%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.16%. General Mills offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than General Mills's net income of $795.7M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.09x versus 1.81x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -2.26%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.83, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $69.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.4%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.79%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.16%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 24.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.09x versus 1.42x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 11.21%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.38%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.83, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than McCormick &.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.16%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is higher than McCormick &'s net income of $184.2M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 26.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.09x versus 3.18x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 8.9% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 32.95%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 5.56% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of 25.15%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $29.83, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $289.20 which suggests that it could grow by 27.05%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.91% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.805%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.16%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Conagra Brands's net income of $284.5M is lower than Constellation Brands's net income of $877M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 73.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 1.09x versus 4.09x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.