GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Campbell Soup has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 6.44%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Campbell Soup's return on equity of 13.49%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.62%. On the other hand Campbell Soup has an analysts' consensus of $43.18 which suggests that it could grow by 14.36%. Given that Campbell Soup has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Campbell Soup is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 85.046% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Campbell Soup has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.226%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Campbell Soup offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Campbell Soup pays out 78.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Campbell Soup quarterly revenues of $2.7B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Campbell Soup's net income of $173M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Campbell Soup's PE ratio is 21.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.64x versus 1.12x for Campbell Soup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 9.6%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.62%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.86 which suggests that it could grow by 24.02%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 85.046% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.041%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.64x versus 1.21x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of 5.4%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 28.51%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.62%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $49.29 which suggests that it could fall by -4.36%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

General Mills has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 85.046% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.831%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.30 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.4B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $235.9M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.64x versus 0.69x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 12.92% compared to General Mills's net margin of -30.3%. General Mills's return on equity of 26.75% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $62.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.62%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.56 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than JM Smucker.

General Mills has a beta of 0.150, which suggesting that the stock is 85.046% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.237%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. General Mills's net income of $625.6M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.56x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.64x versus 1.73x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.