CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 24.7% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 7.16%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.18 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.607%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 0.82x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 24.7% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 7.97%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 13.39%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.71%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.737%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 65.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $283M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 10.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 0.95x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 24.7% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.84%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $276.5625 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.988%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Progressive offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 1.96x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 24.7% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 10.59%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $156.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.72 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 1.23x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.