AFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 11.68%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than American Financial Group, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than American Financial Group.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.12x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.30x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 15.96%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.33 which suggests that it could grow by 6.54%. Given that American Financial Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe American Financial Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.119%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.12x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 10.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.30x versus 2.03x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 7.4%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.22%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than American Financial Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than American Financial Group.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.595%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.12x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.30x versus 0.57x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 11.87% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 15.48%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.11% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $138.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $63.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.02%. Given that American Financial Group has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe American Financial Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.118% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.554%.

American Financial Group has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. American Financial Group pays 88.84% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Financial Group quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. American Financial Group's net income of $255M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, American Financial Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.12x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Financial Group is 1.30x versus 1.86x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.