EXPE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 16.85% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 31.49%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $187.83, signalling downside risk potential of -0.54%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,238.12 which suggests that it could grow by 3.46%. Given that Booking Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Booking Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, which suggesting that the stock is 84.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.937%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $8.75 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $8B. Expedia Group's net income of $684M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 34.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.95x versus 7.58x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of 16.85% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 6.27%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54% beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $187.83, signalling downside risk potential of -0.54%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 232.33%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, which suggesting that the stock is 84.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $69.1M. Expedia Group's net income of $684M is higher than Inspirato's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.95x versus 0.06x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 16.85% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 10.93%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $187.83, signalling downside risk potential of -0.54%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.05%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, which suggesting that the stock is 84.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 210.572%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $206M. Expedia Group's net income of $684M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.95x versus 1.09x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 16.85% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 13.2%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54% beat Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75%.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $187.83, signalling downside risk potential of -0.54%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that Vacasa has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Vacasa is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, which suggesting that the stock is 84.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $314M. Expedia Group's net income of $684M is higher than Vacasa's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.30x while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.95x versus 0.06x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.