AMZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 9.39%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $212.69 which suggests that it could grow by 31.2%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.749%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.80x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 17.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.33x versus 1.61x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of -42.85%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 38.44%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.80x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.33x versus 2.19x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 8.31%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $107.57 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Starbucks.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.692%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.80x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 31.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.33x versus 3.09x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 9.17%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $264.71, signalling upside risk potential of 33.72%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $343.11 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 19.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.80x while Tesla's PE ratio is 122.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.33x versus 8.95x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.