AMZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eBay has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 26.33%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat eBay's return on equity of 34.32%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $249.40, signalling upside risk potential of 49.06%. On the other hand eBay has an analysts' consensus of $64.79 which suggests that it could fall by -1.29%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than eBay, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than eBay.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eBay has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.026%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eBay offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eBay pays out 26.99% of its earnings as a dividend. eBay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than eBay quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than eBay's net income of $679M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while eBay's PE ratio is 16.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 2.81x versus 3.20x for eBay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 9.39%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $249.40, signalling upside risk potential of 49.06%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $205.22 which suggests that it could grow by 39.92%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.349%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 16.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 2.81x versus 1.46x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 8.31%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $249.40, signalling upside risk potential of 49.06%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $101.94 which suggests that it could grow by 27.1%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Starbucks.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.51399999999999%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 26.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 2.81x versus 2.54x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 9.17%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $249.40, signalling upside risk potential of 49.06%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $311.27 which suggests that it could grow by 36.82%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Tesla.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $187.8B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Amazon.com's net income of $20B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.26x while Tesla's PE ratio is 111.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 2.81x versus 8.14x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.