GWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hayward Holdings has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 16.73%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 8.74%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,041.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.93%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.19 which suggests that it could grow by 30.54%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Hayward Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues of $327.1M. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than Hayward Holdings's net income of $54.7M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while Hayward Holdings's PE ratio is 23.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.76x versus 2.61x for Hayward Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 4.41%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,041.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.93%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.556%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $891.7M. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 19.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.76x versus 1.12x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ozop Energy Solutions has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of -2817.6%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat Ozop Energy Solutions's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,041.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.93%. On the other hand Ozop Energy Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Ozop Energy Solutions, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Ozop Energy Solutions.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ozop Energy Solutions has a beta of -3.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 482.073%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. Ozop Energy Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ozop Energy Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Ozop Energy Solutions quarterly revenues of $74.3K. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than Ozop Energy Solutions's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while Ozop Energy Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.76x versus 0.98x for Ozop Energy Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 3.01%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.43%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,041.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.93%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $212.70 which suggests that it could grow by 38.24%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.692% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.639%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.85%. WESCO International offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $165.4M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 11.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.76x versus 0.36x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.