HBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Movado Group has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 2.76%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.42%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 94.57%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.083%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 7.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $937.1M, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $182.7M. Hanesbrands's net income of $30M is higher than Movado Group's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Movado Group's PE ratio is 18.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.50x versus 0.67x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxford Industries has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of -1.28%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19% beat Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.42%. On the other hand Oxford Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.8%. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.309%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxford Industries offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries pays out 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $937.1M, which are larger than Oxford Industries quarterly revenues of $308M. Hanesbrands's net income of $30M is higher than Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oxford Industries's PE ratio is 90.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.50x versus 0.83x for Oxford Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 8.57%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.02%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.42%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $234.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.98%. Given that Ralph Lauren has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Ralph Lauren is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.502, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.24%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $937.1M, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Hanesbrands's net income of $30M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $147.9M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 21.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.50x versus 2.22x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 3.2% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 12.18%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -0.42%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.74%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, which suggesting that the stock is 63.696% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.037%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $937.1M, which are smaller than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Hanesbrands's net income of $30M is lower than Under Armour's net income of $170.4M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.50x versus 0.69x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.