UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.05%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.5%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $81.85 which suggests that it could grow by 23.01%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.898%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 22.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 2.08x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peloton Interactive has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -13.65%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Peloton Interactive's return on equity of --.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.5%. On the other hand Peloton Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $9.96 which suggests that it could grow by 36.65%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Peloton Interactive, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Peloton Interactive.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peloton Interactive has a beta of 1.946, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.602%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peloton Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peloton Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Peloton Interactive quarterly revenues of $674M. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is higher than Peloton Interactive's net income of -$92M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Peloton Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 1.05x for Peloton Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 13.88%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.5%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.22%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 2.15x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 5.92%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.75, signalling upside risk potential of 52.5%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $26.27 which suggests that it could grow by 59.49%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, which suggesting that the stock is 63.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.935%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.53x versus 0.63x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.