KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of -3.54%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 5.8%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.76%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.11 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.801%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of -$144M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.09x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 33.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 3.15x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.94%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.76%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.9338 which suggests that it could fall by -2.91%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.624%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.09x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 36.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 7.93x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 5.48%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.76%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $160.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.65%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.09x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 20.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 2.14x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 19.01% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 21.16%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $75.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.76%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $176.69 which suggests that it could grow by 4.88%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.5B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.09x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 4.93x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.