PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 9.07%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $144.73 which suggests that it could grow by 4.95%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.423%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.07x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.79x versus 2.32x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 19.01%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $75.08 which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.72%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.07x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.79x versus 6.42x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 5.48%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.07x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.79x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.91%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.66, signalling upside risk potential of 9.11%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $108.1085 which suggests that it could grow by 29.95%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.448% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.756%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.46%. Walmart offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.07x while Walmart's PE ratio is 34.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.79x versus 0.99x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.