L Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Loews's net margin of 11.68%. Loews's return on equity of 8.14% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -63.4%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 7.12%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Loews's net income of $187M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.66x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.12x versus 0.88x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Loews's net margin of 15.96%. Loews's return on equity of 8.14% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -63.4%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.51%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Loews, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.119%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Loews's net income of $187M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.66x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.12x versus 2.05x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Loews's net margin of 0.58%. Loews's return on equity of 8.14% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -63.4%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.72%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.011%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Loews's net income of $187M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.66x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 14.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.12x versus 0.96x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Loews's net margin of 11.63%. Loews's return on equity of 8.14% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

Loews has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -63.4%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $289.8235 which suggests that it could fall by -0.48%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than Progressive, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.449% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.961%.

Loews has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.29%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Loews pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loews quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Loews's net income of $187M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Loews's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.66x while Progressive's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loews is 1.12x versus 2.27x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.