SHW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 1.97%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.56%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $386.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $51.94 which suggests that it could grow by 30.06%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.8%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Dow offers a yield of 7.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 334.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.9B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Dow's net income of $214M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.41x while Dow's PE ratio is 26.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.82x versus 0.65x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 3.36%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $386.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $163.96 which suggests that it could grow by 40.65%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.201%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.41x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.82x versus 0.90x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPM International has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 8.99%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat RPM International's return on equity of 25.26%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $386.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand RPM International has an analysts' consensus of $136.63 which suggests that it could grow by 9.05%. Given that Sherwin-Williams has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Sherwin-Williams is more attractive than RPM International.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPM International has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.14999999999999%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. RPM International offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International pays out 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than RPM International quarterly revenues of $2B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than RPM International's net income of $180.6M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.41x while RPM International's PE ratio is 26.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.82x versus 2.21x for RPM International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Sherwin-Williams's net margin of 7.32%. Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 67.63% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Sherwin-Williams has a consensus price target of $386.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.87%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.190, which suggesting that the stock is 18.965% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Sherwin-Williams has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Sherwin-Williams pays 26.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Sherwin-Williams's net income of $806.2M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Sherwin-Williams's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.41x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sherwin-Williams is 3.82x versus 1.03x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.