RPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 3.52% compared to RPM International's net margin of --. RPM International's return on equity of 24.93% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $121.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 292.71%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. RPM International's net income of $52M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.92x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 1.84x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sherwin-Williams has a net margin of 3.52% compared to RPM International's net margin of 9.06%. RPM International's return on equity of 24.93% beat Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 69.91%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $121.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Sherwin-Williams has an analysts' consensus of $374.98 which suggests that it could grow by 11.35%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than Sherwin-Williams, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than Sherwin-Williams.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.548%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Sherwin-Williams offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues of $5.3B. RPM International's net income of $52M is lower than Sherwin-Williams's net income of $480.1M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.92x while Sherwin-Williams's PE ratio is 31.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 1.84x versus 3.71x for Sherwin-Williams. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 3.52% compared to RPM International's net margin of -2.54%. RPM International's return on equity of 24.93% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37%.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $121.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $43.51 which suggests that it could grow by 8.6%. Given that RPM International has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe RPM International is more attractive than United States Steel.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.2%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.5B. RPM International's net income of $52M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$89M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.92x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 26.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 1.84x versus 0.65x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 3.52% compared to RPM International's net margin of --. RPM International's return on equity of 24.93% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

RPM International has a consensus price target of $121.27, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 147.75%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than RPM International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than RPM International.

RPM International has a beta of 1.058, which suggesting that the stock is 5.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

RPM International has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RPM International pays 39.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. RPM International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RPM International quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. RPM International's net income of $52M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, RPM International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.92x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RPM International is 1.84x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.