BIGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of -8.35% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 17.52%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -109.15% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.68, signalling upside risk potential of 33.76%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Autodesk.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.47x versus 10.95x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -8.35% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of 2%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -109.15% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 42.17%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.68, signalling upside risk potential of 33.76%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that BigCommerce Holdings has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe BigCommerce Holdings is more attractive than Agilysys.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.042%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $68.3M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$7M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $1.4M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 39.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.47x versus 15.19x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -8.35% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of -9.14%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -109.15% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.68, signalling upside risk potential of 33.76%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 141.24%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$7M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -8.35% compared to BigCommerce Holdings's net margin of -6.7%. BigCommerce Holdings's return on equity of -109.15% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.68, signalling upside risk potential of 33.76%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.77%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than BigCommerce Holdings, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than BigCommerce Holdings.

BigCommerce Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

BigCommerce Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigCommerce Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigCommerce Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. BigCommerce Holdings's net income of -$7M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, BigCommerce Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigCommerce Holdings is 1.47x versus 1.18x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.