BIRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boot Barn Holdings has a net margin of -45.98% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 12.34%. Allbirds's return on equity of -64.93% beat Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.48%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.64%. On the other hand Boot Barn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $189.08 which suggests that it could grow by 80.54%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Allbirds, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Allbirds.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 2.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.835%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boot Barn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boot Barn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $55.9M, which are smaller than Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues of $608.2M. Allbirds's net income of -$25.7M is lower than Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $75.1M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boot Barn Holdings's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.21x versus 1.75x for Boot Barn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Casey's General Stores has a net margin of -45.98% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 2.23%. Allbirds's return on equity of -64.93% beat Casey's General Stores's return on equity of 16.85%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.64%. On the other hand Casey's General Stores has an analysts' consensus of $427.37 which suggests that it could grow by 5.78%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Casey's General Stores, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Casey's General Stores.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casey's General Stores has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.633%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casey's General Stores offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores pays out 12.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Casey's General Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $55.9M, which are smaller than Casey's General Stores quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Allbirds's net income of -$25.7M is lower than Casey's General Stores's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casey's General Stores's PE ratio is 28.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.21x versus 0.97x for Casey's General Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of -45.98% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 2.18%. Allbirds's return on equity of -64.93% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of 0.42%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.64%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $20.13 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that Allbirds has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Allbirds is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.636%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $55.9M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Allbirds's net income of -$25.7M is lower than Foot Locker's net income of $49M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 124.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.21x versus 0.19x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of -45.98% compared to Allbirds's net margin of 8.3%. Allbirds's return on equity of -64.93% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.6%.

Allbirds has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.64%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 70.26%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Allbirds, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Allbirds.

Allbirds has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.811, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.07%.

Allbirds has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allbirds pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allbirds quarterly revenues are $55.9M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $775.5M. Allbirds's net income of -$25.7M is lower than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of $64.3M. Notably, Allbirds's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allbirds is 0.21x versus 0.21x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.