BITF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -81.71% compared to Bitfarms's net margin of 6.26%. Bitfarms's return on equity of -33.95% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 20.89%.

Bitfarms has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 162.05%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $292.28 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Bitfarms has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Bitfarms is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.336, which suggesting that the stock is 233.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bitfarms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bitfarms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bitfarms quarterly revenues are $44.9M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Bitfarms's net income of -$36.6M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Bitfarms's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 47.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bitfarms is 3.43x versus 14.88x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -81.71% compared to Bitfarms's net margin of 1.53%. Bitfarms's return on equity of -33.95% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Bitfarms has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 162.05%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 38.49%. Given that Bitfarms has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Bitfarms is more attractive than Hut 8.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.336, which suggesting that the stock is 233.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 254.441%.

Bitfarms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bitfarms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bitfarms quarterly revenues are $44.9M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Bitfarms's net income of -$36.6M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Bitfarms's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 12.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bitfarms is 3.43x versus 6.32x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -81.71% compared to Bitfarms's net margin of -94.79%. Bitfarms's return on equity of -33.95% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 7.75%.

Bitfarms has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 162.05%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $26.83 which suggests that it could grow by 33.17%. Given that Bitfarms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Bitfarms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.336, which suggesting that the stock is 233.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 463.426%.

Bitfarms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bitfarms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bitfarms quarterly revenues are $44.9M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $131.6M. Bitfarms's net income of -$36.6M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$124.8M. Notably, Bitfarms's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 22.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bitfarms is 3.43x versus 9.15x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -81.71% compared to Bitfarms's net margin of -182.06%. Bitfarms's return on equity of -33.95% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

Bitfarms has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 162.05%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.39%. Given that Bitfarms has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Bitfarms is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.336, which suggesting that the stock is 233.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

Bitfarms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bitfarms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bitfarms quarterly revenues are $44.9M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. Bitfarms's net income of -$36.6M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, Bitfarms's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 58.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bitfarms is 3.43x versus 9.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.