CLSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hut 8 has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of 44.79%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 53.1%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $21.38, signalling upside risk potential of 181.62%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $32.33 which suggests that it could grow by 160.15%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Hut 8.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, which suggesting that the stock is 320.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.824, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 282.423%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $162.3M, which are smaller than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $339.9M. Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M is higher than Hut 8's net income of $152.2M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.00x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 3.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 3.99x versus 1.75x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -94.79%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $21.38, signalling upside risk potential of 181.62%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.88 which suggests that it could grow by 89.52%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, which suggesting that the stock is 320.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 495.066%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $162.3M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.00x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 8.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 3.99x versus 5.70x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of 95.71%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $21.38, signalling upside risk potential of 181.62%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.60 which suggests that it could grow by 137.84%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, which suggesting that the stock is 320.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.766%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $162.3M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.00x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 21.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 3.99x versus 5.69x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -83.45%. Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $21.38, signalling upside risk potential of 181.62%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.06 which suggests that it could grow by 176.93%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than TeraWulf.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, which suggesting that the stock is 320.684% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.214%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $162.3M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $35M. Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.00x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 3.99x versus 8.20x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.