RIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 95.71% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of 56.84%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 126.8%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $324.32 which suggests that it could grow by 71.63%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, which suggesting that the stock is 335.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $142.6M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.45x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 5.97x versus 7.77x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of 95.71% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of 44.79%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 53.1%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 126.8%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $32.33 which suggests that it could grow by 142.47%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, which suggesting that the stock is 335.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.824, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 282.423%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $142.6M, which are smaller than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $339.9M. Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $152.2M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.45x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 3.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 5.97x versus 1.88x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 95.71% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -94.79%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 126.8%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.88 which suggests that it could grow by 76.37%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, which suggesting that the stock is 335.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 495.066%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $142.6M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.45x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 9.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 5.97x versus 6.13x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of 95.71% compared to Riot Platforms's net margin of -83.45%. Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17%.

Riot Platforms has a consensus price target of $17.60, signalling upside risk potential of 126.8%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.06 which suggests that it could grow by 176.93%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, which suggesting that the stock is 335.766% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.214%.

Riot Platforms has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riot Platforms pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riot Platforms quarterly revenues are $142.6M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $35M. Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M. Notably, Riot Platforms's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.45x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riot Platforms is 5.97x versus 8.20x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.