CTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of 2.25%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 18.42%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1453.4%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $437.13 which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.915%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are $61.2K, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $117.3M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 11.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 0.38x versus 0.29x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of 6.33%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54% beat Openlane's return on equity of 5.43%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1453.4%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $20.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Openlane.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.088%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out -28.81% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are $61.2K, which are smaller than Openlane quarterly revenues of $448.4M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Openlane's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Openlane's PE ratio is 108.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 0.38x versus 1.30x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of -9.83%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1453.4%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -51.28%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.633%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are $61.2K, which are smaller than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 0.38x versus 2.07x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of -2965.78% compared to Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net margin of 2.02%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -31.54% beat CarMax's return on equity of 7.51%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1453.4%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $84.95 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than CarMax, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than CarMax.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.713, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.258%.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues are $61.2K, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$1.8M is lower than CarMax's net income of $125.4M. Notably, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.92x while CarMax's PE ratio is 27.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is 0.38x versus 0.49x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.