KAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of 10.63% compared to Openlane's net margin of -2965.78%. Openlane's return on equity of 8.26% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of $24.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.69%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2996.77%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Openlane.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $492M, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of -$1.4M. Openlane's net income of $52.3M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.34x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.26x versus 5.01x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Group 1 Automotive has a net margin of 10.63% compared to Openlane's net margin of 1.71%. Openlane's return on equity of 8.26% beat Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of $24.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.69%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $490.22 which suggests that it could grow by 27.02%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Openlane.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.524%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Openlane pays 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive pays out 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $492M, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Openlane's net income of $52.3M is lower than Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.34x while Group 1 Automotive's PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.26x versus 0.26x for Group 1 Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 10.63% compared to Openlane's net margin of -9.83%. Openlane's return on equity of 8.26% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of $24.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.69%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -45.13%. Given that Openlane has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Openlane is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.040, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.966%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $492M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Openlane's net income of $52.3M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.34x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.26x versus 1.84x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 10.63% compared to Openlane's net margin of 2.02%. Openlane's return on equity of 8.26% beat CarMax's return on equity of 7.51%.

Openlane has a consensus price target of $24.14, signalling upside risk potential of 16.69%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $90.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.77%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Openlane.

Openlane has a beta of 1.529, which suggesting that the stock is 52.861% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.897%.

Openlane has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Openlane pays 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Openlane quarterly revenues are $492M, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Openlane's net income of $52.3M is lower than CarMax's net income of $125.4M. Notably, Openlane's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.34x while CarMax's PE ratio is 23.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Openlane is 1.26x versus 0.42x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.