GPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of -2965.78%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46% beat Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's return on equity of -47.69%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $490.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.02%. On the other hand Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2996.77%. Given that Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service quarterly revenues of -$1.4M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M is higher than Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service's PE ratio is 4.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.26x versus 5.01x for Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Openlane has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of 10.63%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46% beat Openlane's return on equity of 8.26%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $490.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.02%. On the other hand Openlane has an analysts' consensus of $24.14 which suggests that it could grow by 16.69%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Openlane, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Openlane.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openlane has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.861%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Openlane offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Openlane pays out 40.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Openlane quarterly revenues of $492M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M is higher than Openlane's net income of $52.3M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Openlane's PE ratio is 45.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.26x versus 1.26x for Openlane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of -9.83%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46% beat Kingsway Financial Services's return on equity of -42.93%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $490.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.02%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -45.13%. Given that Group 1 Automotive has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, analysts believe Group 1 Automotive is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services has a beta of -0.040, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.966%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Kingsway Financial Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Kingsway Financial Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.26x versus 1.84x for Kingsway Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Group 1 Automotive's net margin of 2.02%. Group 1 Automotive's return on equity of 17.46% beat CarMax's return on equity of 7.51%.

Group 1 Automotive has a consensus price target of $490.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.02%. On the other hand CarMax has an analysts' consensus of $90.71 which suggests that it could grow by 29.77%. Given that CarMax has higher upside potential than Group 1 Automotive, analysts believe CarMax is more attractive than Group 1 Automotive.

Group 1 Automotive has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.897%.

Group 1 Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. CarMax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Group 1 Automotive pays 5.06% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Group 1 Automotive quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than CarMax quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Group 1 Automotive's net income of $94.8M is lower than CarMax's net income of $125.4M. Notably, Group 1 Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while CarMax's PE ratio is 23.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Group 1 Automotive is 0.26x versus 0.42x for CarMax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.