FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 6.7%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $189.38, signalling upside risk potential of 39.73%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $170.11 which suggests that it could grow by 24.46%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Chevron.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.764%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Chevron's PE ratio is 14.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.63x versus 1.28x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EOG Resources has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 22.14%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 22.11%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $189.38, signalling upside risk potential of 39.73%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 22.22%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.198%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.63x versus 2.71x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of -1.88%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $189.38, signalling upside risk potential of 39.73%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $49.71 which suggests that it could grow by 24.8%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 16.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.63x versus 1.44x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.39%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $189.38, signalling upside risk potential of 39.73%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.60 which suggests that it could grow by 16.3%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.58x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.63x versus 1.36x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.