XOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Exxon Mobil's net margin of 22.14%. Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 22.11%.

Exxon Mobil has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $143.90 which suggests that it could grow by 16.13%. Given that EOG Resources has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe EOG Resources is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.351% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.639%.

Exxon Mobil has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Exxon Mobil pays 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues are $81.1B, which are larger than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B is higher than EOG Resources's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Exxon Mobil's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exxon Mobil is 1.42x versus 3.01x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Exxon Mobil's net margin of 29.06%. Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Exxon Mobil has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $207.04 which suggests that it could grow by 37.84%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.351% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.902%.

Exxon Mobil has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Exxon Mobil pays 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues are $81.1B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Exxon Mobil's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exxon Mobil is 1.42x versus 2.91x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Exxon Mobil's net margin of -1.88%. Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Exxon Mobil has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $59.70 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Occidental Petroleum has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Occidental Petroleum is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.351% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

Exxon Mobil has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Exxon Mobil pays 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues are $81.1B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Exxon Mobil's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exxon Mobil is 1.42x versus 1.68x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Exxon Mobil's net margin of 22.53%. Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Exxon Mobil has a consensus price target of $129.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.58%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $48.33 which suggests that it could grow by 61.17%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, which suggesting that the stock is 17.351% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.168%.

Exxon Mobil has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Exxon Mobil pays 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues are $81.1B, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B is higher than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Exxon Mobil's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.27x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 4.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exxon Mobil is 1.42x versus 1.30x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.