APA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 20.18%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 26.79%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.12, signalling upside risk potential of 47.89%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $50.19 which suggests that it could grow by 63.1%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than APA, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than APA.

APA has a beta of 3.188, which suggesting that the stock is 218.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.815%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 49.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $812M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.97x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 5.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.77x versus 1.24x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 24.92%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.12, signalling upside risk potential of 47.89%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 38.88%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

APA has a beta of 3.188, which suggesting that the stock is 218.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.97x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.77x versus 2.99x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 15.8%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 13.88%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.12, signalling upside risk potential of 47.89%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $62.14 which suggests that it could grow by 31.86%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

APA has a beta of 3.188, which suggesting that the stock is 218.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.474%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $7.2B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Occidental Petroleum's net income of $1.1B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.97x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 12.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.77x versus 1.66x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -8.81% compared to APA's net margin of 9.81%. APA's return on equity of 50.28% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

APA has a consensus price target of $31.12, signalling upside risk potential of 47.89%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.92%. Given that APA has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe APA is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

APA has a beta of 3.188, which suggesting that the stock is 218.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

APA has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. APA pays 10.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

APA quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. APA's net income of -$223M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, APA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.97x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for APA is 0.77x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.