LAUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of --. Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25% beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.75%. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $368.6M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.62x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 1.84x versus 1.99x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of 7.8%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 24.9%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.75%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.06%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.494%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $368.6M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $73.4M. Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M is higher than Franklin Covey's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.62x while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 1.84x versus 1.71x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of 3.46%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.75%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.214%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $368.6M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.62x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 48.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 1.84x versus 1.12x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National American University Holdings has a net margin of 23.18% compared to Laureate Education's net margin of 9.68%. Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25% beat National American University Holdings's return on equity of --.

Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.75%. On the other hand National American University Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, which suggesting that the stock is 18.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.355%.

Laureate Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National American University Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laureate Education pays 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend. National American University Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laureate Education quarterly revenues are $368.6M, which are larger than National American University Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M is higher than National American University Holdings's net income of $225K. Notably, Laureate Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.62x while National American University Holdings's PE ratio is 1.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laureate Education is 1.84x versus 0.10x for National American University Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.