CHGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Covey has a net margin of -155.67% compared to Chegg's net margin of 7.8%. Chegg's return on equity of -117.6% beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 24.9%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.06%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.081% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.494%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $73.4M. Chegg's net income of -$212.6M is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.31x versus 1.71x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of -155.67% compared to Chegg's net margin of 23.18%. Chegg's return on equity of -117.6% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.081% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.535%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $368.6M. Chegg's net income of -$212.6M is lower than Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.31x versus 1.84x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -155.67% compared to Chegg's net margin of 3.46%. Chegg's return on equity of -117.6% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Chegg, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Chegg.

Chegg has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.081% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.214%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. Chegg's net income of -$212.6M is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 48.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.31x versus 1.12x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National American University Holdings has a net margin of -155.67% compared to Chegg's net margin of 9.68%. Chegg's return on equity of -117.6% beat National American University Holdings's return on equity of --.

Chegg has a consensus price target of $9.28, signalling upside risk potential of 4.99%. On the other hand National American University Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chegg has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Chegg is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

Chegg has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.081% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.355%.

Chegg has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National American University Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chegg pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National American University Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chegg quarterly revenues are $136.6M, which are larger than National American University Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Chegg's net income of -$212.6M is lower than National American University Holdings's net income of $225K. Notably, Chegg's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National American University Holdings's PE ratio is 1.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chegg is 0.31x versus 0.10x for National American University Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.