NAUH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EpicQuest Education Group International has a net margin of 9.68% compared to National American University Holdings's net margin of --. National American University Holdings's return on equity of -- beat EpicQuest Education Group International's return on equity of -57.44%.

National American University Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EpicQuest Education Group International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that EpicQuest Education Group International has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe EpicQuest Education Group International is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 220.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EpicQuest Education Group International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

National American University Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EpicQuest Education Group International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National American University Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EpicQuest Education Group International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National American University Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are larger than EpicQuest Education Group International quarterly revenues of --. National American University Holdings's net income of $225K is higher than EpicQuest Education Group International's net income of --. Notably, National American University Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.07x while EpicQuest Education Group International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National American University Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.99x for EpicQuest Education Group International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 9.68% compared to National American University Holdings's net margin of 7.8%. National American University Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Covey's return on equity of 24.9%.

National American University Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Covey has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.06%. Given that Franklin Covey has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Franklin Covey is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 220.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Covey has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.494%.

National American University Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Covey offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National American University Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Covey pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National American University Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Franklin Covey quarterly revenues of $73.4M. National American University Holdings's net income of $225K is lower than Franklin Covey's net income of $5.7M. Notably, National American University Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.07x while Franklin Covey's PE ratio is 20.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National American University Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.71x for Franklin Covey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of 9.68% compared to National American University Holdings's net margin of 23.18%. National American University Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 26.25%.

National American University Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that Laureate Education has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Laureate Education is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 220.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.535%.

National American University Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. National American University Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 104.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

National American University Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $368.6M. National American University Holdings's net income of $225K is lower than Laureate Education's net income of $85.5M. Notably, National American University Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.07x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National American University Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.84x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 9.68% compared to National American University Holdings's net margin of 3.46%. National American University Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 5.98%.

National American University Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than National American University Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than National American University Holdings.

National American University Holdings has a beta of -1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 220.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.214%.

National American University Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. National American University Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

National American University Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $114.4M. National American University Holdings's net income of $225K is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $4M. Notably, National American University Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.07x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 48.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National American University Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.12x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.