LOCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 4.47%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 42.05%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 50.03%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $56.22 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.257%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $921M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $41.2M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 15.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.65x versus 0.67x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 8.73%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 50.03%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 26.42%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Brinker International.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.326%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 25.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.65x versus 1.38x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 8.06%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 50.03%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $191.16 which suggests that it could grow by 12.53%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0029999999999974%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 26.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.65x versus 2.12x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 5.21% compared to El Pollo Loco Holdings's net margin of 16.53%. El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 10.1% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 50.03%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $316.31 which suggests that it could grow by 46.81%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Wingstop.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.507, which suggesting that the stock is 50.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.878, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.824%.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.3M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, El Pollo Loco Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.02x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 58.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for El Pollo Loco Holdings is 0.65x versus 10.12x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.