TXRH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 7.44%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $191.62, signalling upside risk potential of 11.09%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $200.21 which suggests that it could grow by 7.42%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0029999999999974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.282%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.15x versus 1.92x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 8.73%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $191.62, signalling upside risk potential of 11.09%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 31.31%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0029999999999974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.326%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.15x versus 1.33x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 8.27%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 69.59%.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $191.62, signalling upside risk potential of 11.09%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $17.47 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0029999999999974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.198%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 6.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 105.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $574.3M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is higher than The Wendy's's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.15x versus 1.40x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Texas Roadhouse's net margin of 16.53%. Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $191.62, signalling upside risk potential of 11.09%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $322.74 which suggests that it could grow by 51.38%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0029999999999974% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.878, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.824%.

Texas Roadhouse has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Texas Roadhouse pays 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Texas Roadhouse's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 57.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Texas Roadhouse is 2.15x versus 10.01x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.