MKTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 8.96%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.69%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $224.70 which suggests that it could grow by 30.12%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.768%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.4B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 24.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.02x versus 2.02x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 24.69%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.69%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $137.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.12%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.218%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $15B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.7B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.02x versus 3.30x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 95.71%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.69%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.60 which suggests that it could grow by 137.84%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.766%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 21.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.02x versus 5.69x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 34.53%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $234.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.69%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.90 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.615%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.90x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.02x versus 7.26x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.