PANL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 21.6%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 7.46%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.32%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $23.37 which suggests that it could grow by 66.46%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Genco Shipping & Trading, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Genco Shipping & Trading.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.762%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 11.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out -317.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $99.3M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is lower than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of $21.5M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.44x versus 1.39x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 10.83%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.32%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $114.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Kirby.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.17%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is lower than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Kirby's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.44x versus 1.90x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of 20.7%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.32%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.435%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.44x versus 1.44x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 3.34% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net margin of -23.72%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.32%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 115.95%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.762%.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.08%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues are $153.1M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $68.9M. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Pangaea Logistics Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pangaea Logistics Solutions is 0.44x versus 0.60x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.