MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Matson's net margin of 21.6%. Matson's return on equity of 16.95% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 7.46%.

Matson has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $23.37 which suggests that it could grow by 66.46%. Given that Genco Shipping & Trading has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.762%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 11.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Matson pays 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out -317.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $962M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $99.3M. Matson's net income of $199.1M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of $21.5M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.53x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.44x versus 1.39x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Matson's net margin of 10.83%. Matson's return on equity of 16.95% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Matson has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $114.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.17%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $962M, which are larger than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Matson's net income of $199.1M is higher than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.53x while Kirby's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.44x versus 1.90x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Matson's net margin of 3.34%. Matson's return on equity of 16.95% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Matson has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.32%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.6%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 8.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Matson pays 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $962M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Matson's net income of $199.1M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.53x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.44x versus 0.44x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Matson's net margin of -23.72%. Matson's return on equity of 16.95% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18%.

Matson has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.63%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 115.95%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.044, which suggesting that the stock is 4.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.762%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $962M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $68.9M. Matson's net income of $199.1M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.53x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.44x versus 0.60x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.