SMHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of -23.72% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 10.83%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $114.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kirby.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.17%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $68.9M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M is lower than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirby's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 1.90x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of -23.72% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 20.7%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.435%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matson offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $68.9M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matson's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 1.44x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of -23.72% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 3.34%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.32%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.6%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 8.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $68.9M, which are smaller than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M is lower than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 10.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 0.44x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -23.72% compared to Seacor Marine Holdings's net margin of 1.66%. Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -13.18% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 115.95%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.26%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.776%.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seacor Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are $68.9M, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $203.6M. Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$16.3M is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Seacor Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 38.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seacor Marine Holdings is 0.60x versus 0.39x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.