WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -69.65%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 176.93%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 148.39%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Cleanspark, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Cleanspark.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 320.684%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $162.3M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 70.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.20x versus 4.08x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -94.79%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 176.93%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.04 which suggests that it could grow by 76.33%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 495.066%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 9.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.20x versus 5.91x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 95.71%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 176.93%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.30 which suggests that it could grow by 122.94%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.766%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 22.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.20x versus 5.97x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soluna Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -95.55%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 176.93%. On the other hand Soluna Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.267%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soluna Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soluna Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.5M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Soluna Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.20x versus 0.11x for Soluna Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.