ACA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 9.72%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.35%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 62.74%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.432%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $202.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.63x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.55x versus 0.79x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 3.11%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.35%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 97.37%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.961%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.63x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.55x versus 0.23x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of -1.56%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.35%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 51.52%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.63x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.55x versus 0.15x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -1.16% compared to Arcosa's net margin of 22.7%. Arcosa's return on equity of 3.91% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

Arcosa has a consensus price target of $111.83, signalling upside risk potential of 37.35%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 71.51%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Arcosa, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Arcosa.

Arcosa has a beta of 0.850, which suggesting that the stock is 14.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.836%.

Arcosa has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.25%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcosa pays 10.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arcosa's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcosa quarterly revenues are $666.2M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Arcosa's net income of -$7.7M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Arcosa's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.63x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcosa is 1.55x versus 1.70x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.