GLDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluor has a net margin of 9.72% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 43.73%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72% beat Fluor's return on equity of 84.64%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 64.03%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $52.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.07%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.07% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.561%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $202.8M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M is lower than Fluor's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Fluor's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.79x versus 0.39x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 9.72% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 3.11%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -1.28%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 64.03%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 96.63%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.07% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.238%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $202.8M, which are smaller than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.9M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.79x versus 0.23x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 9.72% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of -0.54%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 64.03%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.8%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.07% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.979%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $202.8M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $561.6M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 66.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.79x versus 1.89x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 9.72% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margin of 22.7%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 13.72% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $14.50, signalling upside risk potential of 64.03%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 70.76%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.07% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.378%.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues are $202.8M, which are smaller than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $19.7M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 14.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is 0.79x versus 1.71x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.