FLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 1.32% compared to Fluor's net margin of 4.63%. Fluor's return on equity of 12.15% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 14.75%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 25.14%. Given that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.343%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Fluor's net income of $54M is higher than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.55x versus 1.07x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Group Holdings has a net margin of 1.32% compared to Fluor's net margin of 1.88%. Fluor's return on equity of 12.15% beat Orion Group Holdings's return on equity of -10.35%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Orion Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.57%. Given that Orion Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Fluor, analysts believe Orion Group Holdings is more attractive than Fluor.

Fluor has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Group Holdings has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.577%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Orion Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $226.7M. Fluor's net income of $54M is higher than Orion Group Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Orion Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.55x versus 0.33x for Orion Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 1.32% compared to Fluor's net margin of 4.52%. Fluor's return on equity of 12.15% beat Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Quanta Services has an analysts' consensus of $333.37 which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Fluor has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.458%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanta Services offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Fluor pays 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Quanta Services quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Fluor's net income of $54M is lower than Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Quanta Services's PE ratio is 60.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.55x versus 2.15x for Quanta Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 1.32% compared to Fluor's net margin of 10.33%. Fluor's return on equity of 12.15% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 28.17%.

Fluor has a consensus price target of $57.75, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.34%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Sterling Infrastructure, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Sterling Infrastructure.

Fluor has a beta of 1.890, which suggesting that the stock is 88.961% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.169%.

Fluor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluor pays 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluor quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $593.7M. Fluor's net income of $54M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $61.3M. Notably, Fluor's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.96x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 29.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluor is 0.55x versus 2.60x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.